OA-23 reflects the prior payer's adjudication on a secondary claim, using the Other Adjustment group. Unlike CO, the OA group does not itself assign the amount to the provider as a write-off, and unlike PR it does not assign it to the patient.
What OA-23 means
Group codes carry financial meaning: CO is a contractual write-off, PR is patient responsibility, and OA is neither — an adjustment the code set does not classify. That ambiguity matters at posting time, because an OA amount handled as a write-off may forfeit a balance that belonged elsewhere, and one billed to a patient may be billed wrongly. The remittance's other lines usually resolve where the amount actually lands.
Why OA-23 fires
- The secondary is coordinating against the primary's adjudication.
- An adjustment does not fit the contractual or patient-responsibility categories.
- The payer's mapping assigns coordination amounts to the Other Adjustment group by default.
Is OA-23 worth appealing?
Sometimes worth appealing
How to resolve or appeal OA-23
- 1
Read the whole remittance line
Other adjustments on the same line usually establish whether a balance remains and to whom.
- 2
Ask the payer to classify it
Where it genuinely matters, ask in writing whether the amount is contractual or patient responsibility.
OA-23 — frequently asked
Can I bill the patient for an OA amount?
Why do payers use OA here?
Related guides
Reason-code meanings are paraphrased from the X12 Claim Adjustment Reason Code list for plain-language reference; they are not reproduced verbatim. This is general information, not legal, coding, or medical advice — always confirm against the payer's remittance and policy.
Turn this OA-23 denial into a signed appeal
Upload the denied EOB and Merits builds a complete OA-23 appeal — the argument, the payer's own coverage criteria, and your federal appeal rights, every claim cited to a named source. $9 a letter. No account.
